Sustainability

In financing of the sustainable transformation, the fund industry plays a key role as a significant capital-raising source. However, the lack of standards for investments that can be considered sustainable in terms of EU regulation leads to uncertainty in the market. The EU is working on several projects for this purpose. These include considerations for a classification system for sustainable products and the standardisation of sustainability reporting obligations. New ESMA guidelines provide more clarity for fund names with sustainability references.

© iStock.com/Ruslan_Khismatov

The EU is aiming for a climate neutral economy by 2050 and wants to support sustainable economic sectors and production processes by directing capital flows into corresponding activities. The fund industry, as a significant capital-raising source is happy to play a key role in this endeavour. Asset managers have a longstanding track record of financing sustainable projects and companies or offer sustainable products or services. As early as 2012, the BVI introduced its ‘Guidelines for Responsible Investment’.

Although EU legislators have adopted a flood of detailed regulations, they have not yet established any valid definitions of what consitutes a sustainable product. The EU taxonomy and the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) currently only govern transparency obligations. Therefore, the BVI supports the EU Commission's considerations to introduce a classification system for sustainable products. Among other things, a product category for sustainable transformation is being discussed. This would enable investors to distinguish between funds that invest in ‘green’ assets and those that support the transition from ‘brown’ to ‘green’ business models. Additionally, this could help curb discussions about greenwashing.

Im May 2024, the EU authority ESMA published guidelines for fund names using ESG or sustainability-related terms to combat greenwashing. The guidelines aim to prevent misleading fund names. ESMA has set a minimum threshold of 80 per cent of investments that are intended to achieve environmental resp. social characteristics or sustainable investment objectives for the use of sustainability-related terms such as ‘ESG’, ‘sustainable’ and ‘impact’. The guidelines also contain standardised exclusion criteria for various terms contained in fund names. The guidelines apply to all funds launched from 21 November 2024. For older funds with an ESG reference in the fund name, a transitional period of six months applies from the date of application of the guidelines, i.e. until 21 May 2025.

Since August 2022, investment advisors have to ask their clients about their sustainability preferences and offer suitable products. However, the lack of details and standards hinders the advice. Therefore, the BVI and the German Banking Industry and the Derivatives Association (BSW) have developed a joint target market concept for sustainable financial products. The concept provides a reliable minimum standard for the German market which is by date unique in Europe. In the meantime, the associations have revised the ESG target market concept and harmonised it with the standard of the ESMA guidelines for sustainability-related additions to fund names. This will remove the general exclusion of armaments in funds marketed as sustainable. However, the exclusion of banned weapons under international law remains in place.

Overall, there is much room for interpretation in investment advice remaining, due to the lack of regulatory guidelines. Among others, determining the minimum share of sustainable investments at fund level proves to be difficult, as there are no binding and consistent calculation methods. This may result in products pursuing a similar investment strategy whilst reporting significantly different shares of sustainable investments. This complicates understanding for both advisors and investors to understand and makes investment advice on sustainability very complex. Clear standards and the introduction of product categories for sustainability could help alleviate these issues in the future.

The regulation of ESG rating providers is also an important step towards clearer criteria and increasing the quality of sustainable investment products. In April 2024, the EU Parliament adopted the ESG Rating Regulation. According to this regulation, ESG rating providers will be subject to central authorisation and supervision by ESMA in the future. A key point of negotiation was the handling of internal ESG ratings created by fund companies for the purposes of their own products and services. The compromise now includes additional disclosure obligations regarding the methods of such internal ESG ratings if they are communicated to third parties as part of advertising. The ESG Rating Regulation is expected to come into force in 2026.

At the end of 2024, fund companies in Germany managed a total of just under EUR 1,050 billion in retail funds and Spezialfonds with sustainability features. At EUR 764 billion, retail funds accounted for just under three quarters of assets under management.

Mehr zum Thema

ESG-Zielmarkt­konzept überarbeitet

Die Verbände der Deutschen Kreditwirtschaft, BVI und BSW haben den gemeinsamen Standard zur Zielmarktbestimmung in Sachen Nachhaltigkeit aktualisiert.

mehr
© ipopba / AdobeStock

Fokus Nachhaltig­keit

Die Marktentwicklung treibt das Vermögen von Fonds mit Nachhaltigkeitsmerkmalen auf neuen Rekordstand – Neugeschäft rückläufig.

 

mehr
© noppadon / AdobeStock

Ausschluss für Rüstung soll fallen

Podcast Episode 47 vom 1. Oktober 2024

 

mehr
© Adobe Stock / OneClic

Ausschluss für Rüstung soll fallen

Warum das ESG-Zielmarktkonzept geändert wird und was das für die Fondsbranche und die Anleger bedeutet, erläutert Dr. Magdalena Kuper im Interview.

mehr
@ iStock / 473291366

Regeln für nachhaltige Produkte: Kommt der System­wechsel?

BVI-Jahrbuch 2024 (S. 10-11)

mehr
© iStockphoto / FS-Stock

Finale Berichte zur Grünfärberei

Die EU-Behörden haben die finalen Berichte zur Grünfärberei in den jeweils beaufsichtigten Sektoren des Finanzmarktes veröffentlicht.

mehr
© lizenziert durch Canva

SFDR-Überprüfung: Erstes Meinungsbild

Die EU-Kommission hat eine Zusammenfassung der 324 Stellungnahmen zur Überprüfung der Offenlegungsverordnung veröffentlicht.

mehr
© istock / lightpoet

BVI zur Überprüfung der SFDR

Wir unterstützen die Einführung eines Klassifizierungssystems für nachhaltige Produkte. Unsere Stellungnahme zur Überprüfung der SFDR lesen Sie hier.

mehr
© flyalone / AdobeStocks

CSDDD: Finanzsektor
vorerst nicht erfasst

Das Investmentgeschäft fällt vorerst nicht unter die EU-Lieferkettenverordnung. Diese Entscheidung soll in einigen Jahren überprüft werden.

mehr
© gerasimov174 / AdobeStock

Neues zur EU-Taxonomie

Die EU-Kommission veröffentlicht zwei Bekanntmachungen zur Auslegung und Umsetzung der Taxonomie. Die ESMA sieht Defizite in den Berichtspraktiken.

mehr
© Kalawin / AdobeStock

Wie werden nach­haltige Produkte künftig klassi­fiziert?

Podcast-Episode 35 vom 30.10.2023.

mehr
© Adobe Stock / OneClic

Präferenz­­abfrage zu kompliziert

Eine Untersuchung der ESMA zeigt, dass Kunden mit den Kategorien der Nachhaltigkeitspräferenzen überfordert sind. Der BVI fordert eine Vereinfachung.

mehr
© ipopba / AdobeStock

Ist der Hype bei der Nachhaltig­keit vorbei?

Podcast Episode 33 vom 28.8.2023

 

 

mehr
© Adobe Stock / OneClic

Positions

21/6/2024

Sustainability

BVI position on ESMA’s Consultation Paper Proposed Revisions to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 447/2012 and Annex I of CRA Regulation

download

18/12/2023

Sustainability / Financial market data

BVI’s position on the targeted consultation document implementation of the Sustainable Finance Disclosures Regulation (SFDR)

download

17/10/2023

Benchmarks / Financial market data / Sustainability / Rating Regulation

Regulation of ESG rating activities: Joint paper of BVI, GDV, AFG and France Assureurs

download

BVI's positions from A-Z

Member area

Combined Shape Created with Sketch.